Monday, 26 January 2015

Signage on Grade 2 listed building without consent, (ex White Horse, 1 High Street, Biggleswade)

email to CBC dated 6th January 2015:

I understand that you have been involved in planning applications for this building, CB/14/01352 Full & CB/1401353/LB.
 

The building which is listed as being a Grade 2 building set within the Biggleswade Town Centre Conservation  has today signage, similar to below, across the front of the building announcing that it is the new showrooms for:

who are at this time are around the corner at 10 High Street and have a sign in their window announcing they are moving to 1 High Street.
 
I assume that the change to retail from a public house is permitted but I have not seen any application for advertising signage which is required in a conservation area.
 
Perhaps you can look at this please and advise.

Response from CBC, 7th January 2015:

The legislation in England for the control of advertisements is set out by The Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007 (as amended). These regulations outline advertisements which have been given Deemed Consent by the Secretary of State subject to standard conditions and those which require Express Consent from the Local Planning Authority or the Secretary of State (if appealed). Additional restrictions apply to those advertisements within Areas of Special Control and in some cases Conservation Areas although the allocation of one does not follow the other.

The site in subject is located within a Conservation Area whereby illuminated advertisements on business premises will require Express Consent, but it should be noted that the Biggleswade Conservation Area is not an Area of Special Control.

Non-illuminated advertisements displayed on business premises wholly with reference to any or all of the following: the business carried on, the goods sold or services provided, or the name or qualifications of the person carrying on the business, or supplying the goods or services, on those premises; have been granted Deemed Consent through the Regulations subject to the advertisement not exceeding the relevant limitations or conditions of the Deemed Consent and that the development would comply with the standard conditions.

The Limitations and Conditions of Deemed consent for such non-illuminated advertisements are (note the site is not in a area of Special Control):

1.     In the case of a shop, no advertisement may be displayed except on a wall containing a shop window.
2.     In an area of special control, the space occupied by the advertisement may not exceed one-tenth of the overall area of the face of the building on which it is displayed, up to a height of 3.6 metres from ground level; and the area occupied by the advertisement shall, notwithstanding that it is displayed in some other manner, be calculated as if the whole advertisement were displayed flat against the face of the building.
3.     Illumination is not permitted unless—
(a)   the advertisement states that the services of a practitioner in human health or a veterinary surgeon are available at the premises on which the advertisement is displayed, or that medical or veterinary supplies are available there;
(b)   the illumination—
                                      i.        is by static means,
                                     ii.        includes no intermittent light source, flashing lights, moving parts or features, exposed cold cathode tubing, animation or retroflective material, and
                                    iii.        is in a manner reasonably required to fulfil the purpose of the advertisement; and
(c)    the levels of luminance do not exceed the levels set out in paragraph 2 of Part 2.
4.     No character or symbol on the advertisement may be more than 0.75 metre in height, or 0.3 metre in an area of special control.
5.     No part of the advertisement may be higher above ground level than whichever is the lower of—
(a)   4.6 metres, or 3.6 metres in an area of special control; and
(b)   the bottom level of any first floor window in the wall on which the advertisement is displayed.
6.     The area of an advertisement consisting of a single placard or poster shall not exceed 1.55 square metres.

The Standard Conditions are:

1.     No advertisement is to be displayed without the permission of the owner of the site or any other person with an interest in the site entitled to grant permission.
2.     No advertisement shall be sited or displayed so as to—
(a)   endanger persons using any highway, railway, waterway, dock, harbour or aerodrome (civil or military);
(b)   obscure, or hinder the ready interpretation of, any traffic sign, railway signal or aid to navigation by water or air; or
(c)   hinder the operation of any device used for the purpose of security or surveillance or for measuring the speed of any vehicle.
3.     Any advertisement displayed, and any site used for the display of advertisements, shall be maintained in a condition that does not impair the visual amenity of the site.
4.     Any structure or hoarding erected or used principally for the purpose of displaying advertisements shall be maintained in a condition that does not endanger the public.
5.     Where an advertisement is required under these Regulations to be removed, the site shall be left in a condition that does not endanger the public or impair visual amenity.

Therefore subject to the sign complying with the above Limitations and Conditions and the Standard Conditions, the advertisements may not require express advertisement consent. However the Building in question is a Listed Building whereby it is considered that the erection of advertisements on the exterior of the building would require Listed Building Consent. I will pass the matter to Planning Enforcement to investigate.

CBC Planning Enforcement Officer email 19th January 2015:

The above matter has been investigated and I can advise you that the change of use of the building from public house to retail is a permitted development and did not require planning permission. I have noted the non-illuminated signs on the front and north elevations of the building, and I can confirm that express advertisement consent is required for the side elevation sign only. However, because the building is Grade II listed, Listed Building consent is required for attaching the signs. The Conservation Area location does not affect this position

I have written to Loline Interiors to advise them of the position and expect that retrospective applications will be submitted for the unauthorised work and display.

Saturday, 3 January 2015

Who will you vote for & why.

On the 30th December 2014, Mark Foster asked the question on We Love Biggleswade - So here goes.... I know by asking the questions, there is potential for negative responses....That's not really what I'm looking for..
May 2015 - Town, County, and General Elections. All the same day. Some candidates that you may know little or nothing about..
When voting for a Town Councillor, what's more important to you, the candidate or the party?
How do you want your Town Councillor to get your views and represent you?
How much do you know about current Town Councillors, and what they do?
I'm genuinely interested in how the town can be made even better than it is, and that is undoubtedly influenced in part by how effective the Town Council, and individual Councillors are...
It would be great if any replies are balanced and factual..
______________________________________________________

We have lived in Biggleswade over 30 years and have watched the town grow and grow and it is still growing.

I am not convinced that the redevelopment of the London Road Retail Park is going to be a good thing for the town. The developers are already trying to stretch the conditions and assurances given about not being in direct competition with the Town. First it was an application for a Boots pharmacy, with negotiated conditions that they would keep the one in the Town open for 5 years. Boots do not now appear on the latest list of tenants. Then it was the granting of a Lawful Development Certificate for Pets at Home, to run a veterinary surgery and/or grooming parlour as the original planning permission does not exclude those uses. It only excludes, Post Office, Ticket Agent, Travel Agents, Hairdressers, Funeral Directors, Dry Cleaner, Laundrette, clothing & shoe repairs, Internet Café, & Pharmacy. I can foresee the developers looking for other loopholes.

I became “involved” with Biggleswade Town Council (BTC) many years ago now, when I asked a couple of genuine questions and got rather obtuse answers and was questioned about why I need to know. This was after the Freedom of Information Act came in in 2000. The more questions I asked the more resistance I got to answer them. I have complained a number of times about Biggleswade Town Council to the Information Commissioners Office in order to be provided with information I requested.

For a number of years I was generally the only member of the public that attended Biggleswade Town Council & Committee Meetings. During that time I battled against non-existent legislation being quoted to exclude members of the public for the council to discuss exempt items. When I challenged this at one meeting, I was told in no uncertain terms by the Mayor at the time that he would throw anybody out of the meeting he did not want there and as Mayor he had the authority to do that. Not recorded in the minutes.

Meeting dates are published in the Biggleswade Bulletin to satisfy a statutory requirement and on the BTC web site, although often I have to ask for approved minutes to be published and the agenda to be online prior to a meeting.

Recently others have started to attend the meetings and there are sometimes 8 or 9 Members of the public, including Mark Foster.

In the last two or three years with some new Councillors, things have improved in some areas. The web site was launched and very recently the Facebook page, but they need to be kept up to date.



The web site still has photographs of two councillors missing, apparently it’s not compulsory and the councillors attendance record for last year is woefully out of date, although I did request a month ago it be updated. There are quite often very simple glaring mistakes on the web site that BTC do not know about until it is brought to their attention.

The biggest problem with BTC is that most of the members do not “engage”, I hate that word, but it applies, with the general public. In fact I sat at one meeting a while ago and when it was suggested that a consultation exercise was carried out, a still serving councillor thumped the table and said we are the elected representatives and we make the decisions. Not recorded in the minutes.

The biggest consultation exercise BTC was involved with was the production of the Town Plan. Even then when it came to looking at a new health centre BTC decided the best place for it was at Saxon Gate despite the conclusion of the Town Plan saying that it was wanted in the Town Centre, which the Doctors supported. This was ignored as only 17% of residents responded. Some councillors get elected on not much more than that. BTC applied for planning consent on land they did not own on Saxon Drive and pursued it to a planning appeal which they lost after they had spent nearly £70,000 of our money.

Only one councillor has a regular surgery where he meets the public one on one face to face. He also uses Social media to find out what people are thinking and what they want and he is very approachable.

Someone mentioned in response to Mark Foster a Community Centre. Well we used to have one it was called the Avenue Centre, at the Avenue off The Baulk. All sorts of organisations used it. BTC bought it from Bedfordshire County Council, decided it was in a dilapidated condition and too expensive to repair, the site was sold for housing. The monies were to be ring fenced for another Community Centre.

Someone also mentioned parking on pavements and verges and Central Bedfordshire Council (CBC) have obtained an order which can be implemented in problems areas. BTC were asked to consult residents on this but BTC decided it was not their responsibility.

Dog Control Orders are now being introduced but I cannot find out what the BTC response was to the consultation as they did not keep a copy and CBC did not receive them as it was done on line and there must have been computer glitch!

Drinkers, All of the Town Centre including the bus station is part of the Alcohol Exclusion Zone. Plan published on my facebook page:

Did you know of a new initiative which includes BTC to remove drinkers out of the Town Centre to a Pod probably based near the Dan Albone car park where they can be counselled by a number of different agencies.

Did you know the flower beds outside Stratton House Hotel are planted up and maintained by BTC. I have been trying for a long time to get them to put something in the flower bed to show that. Did you know that the “flower beds” opposite the library are also maintained by BTC. I have been trying for a long time to get them to properly maintain them or turf them over. Have a look the next time you pass by!

New play equipment. At last some is being provided but did anyone from BTC ask you what you children and grandchildren would like? Over Kitelands we have two pieces of equipment that hardly anyone plays on.

I know being a Council member on a voluntary basis can take up an awful lot of time and some of them do work very hard at it.

There are a lots of things going on.

Biggleswade Parking policy produced over a year ago, without public consultation, by BTC which they are fighting with CBC to implement. To try and relieve the parking problems in Dells Lane. Part of this is looking to buy Rose Lane car park which is rented at present and the provision of a multi storey car park at Bonds Lane / Foundry Lane.

The Transport Hub at the railway station.

A pedestrian crossing down Shortmead Street and along London Road, which BTC were looking to contribute towards providing. After months of backwards and forwards without any progress, CBC have just unilaterally announced a crossing will be provided along London Road where the school children choose to cross. Plan published on my facebook page:

A one way system around St Johns Street. Again after much discussion with CBC they have now added an HGV ban to the proposals without any agreement.

There are a lot of things BTC are trying to do but they never seem to involve the public or tell us what is going on. The only way I know is that I get a copy of Agenda, the minutes and attend as many meeting as I can, as the minutes do not always reflect the discussions that took place.

To answer one of Marks questions, personally at a local level, I would vote for any councillor, whatever party they represent, who genuinely gets involved with the public and tries to gets things done.

Finally the Wetherspoons planning application. BTC are apparently not against the application in principle but there is a question of an Ancient Right of Way through the yard which CBC should have resolved some time ago. Biggleswade History Society have provided CBC with documents which apparently show its existence.